Legal Opinion
Frieda Herrmann, as Sole Remaining Trustee Under Trust Agreement Dated March 30, 1946, by and Between Fred Nagel, Donor, and Frieda Herrmann and Hazel Ouse, Trustees v. William P. Rogers, Attorney General of the United States, William P. Rogers, Attorney General of the United States v. Frieda Herrmann, as Sole Remaining Trustee Under Trust Agreement Dated March 30, 1946, by and Between Fred Nagel, Donor, and Frieda Herrmann and Hazel Ouse, Trustees
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided July 17, 1958No. 15233Published
1Opinion of the Court
256 F.2d 871
Frieda HERRMANN, as sole remaining trustee under Trust Agreement dated March 30, 1946, by and between Fred Nagel, donor, and Frieda Herrmann and Hazel Ouse, trustees, Appellant,
v.
William P. ROGERS, Attorney General of the United States, Appellee.
William P. ROGERS, Attorney General of the United States, Appellant,
v.
Frieda HERRMANN, as sole remaining trustee under Trust Agreement dated March 30, 1946, by and between Fred Nagel, donor, and Frieda Herrmann and Hazel Ouse, trustees, Appellee.
No. 15233.
United States Court of Appeals Ninth Circuit.
April 2, 1958.
As Amended July 17, 1958.
1
F…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- United States v. Chemical Foundation, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1926
- Cummings v. Deutsche Bank Und DiscontogesellschaftSupreme Court of the United States · 1937
- Cities Service Co. v. McGrathSupreme Court of the United States · 1952
- Free's EstateSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1937
- Brownell v. GebhardtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1956
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.