Legal Opinion

Bridgestone/firestone, Inc. v. Pension Benefit Guaranty Corporation

Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit

Decided December 22, 1989No. 88-7270PublishedCited by 21 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion for the Court filed by Circuit Judge SILBERMAN.

SILBERMAN, Circuit Judge:

This appeal presents the question of whether the pension plan termination provisions of the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974 (“ERISA”) 1 , prior to its amendment in 1987, allowed an employer to retain all residual assets of an over-funded plan when actual investment earnings on employee contributions exceeded the plan specified interest rate on those contributions. The Pension Benefit Guaranty Corporation (“PBGC”), a United States government corporation that administers and enforces the pension plan…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Chevron U. S. A. Inc. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. MacKey v. Lanier Collection Agency & Service, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1988
  3. United States v. ShimerSupreme Court of the United States · 1961
  4. United Air Lines, Inc. v. McMannSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
  5. Mead Corp. v. TilleySupreme Court of the United States · 1989

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by21 opinions

  1. Holland v. Valhi Inc.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1994
  2. West End Tenants Ass'n v. George Washington UniversityDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1994
  3. Disability Rights Council v. Washington Metropolitan Area Transit AuthorityDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2006
  4. LTV Corp. v. Pension Benefit Guaranty Corp. (In Re Chateaugay Corp.)United States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. New York · 1990
  5. Jacobson v. Hughes Aircraft Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1997

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API