Legal Opinion

Schmedes v. . Deffaa

New York Court of Appeals

Decided March 23, 1915PublishedCited by 16 opinions

Appeal in each of the above-entitled actions from a judgment of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the first judicial department, entered January 3, 1913, affirming a judgment in favor of defendant entered upon a dismissal of the complaint by the court at a Trial Term. The first action was brought to recover for personal injuries alleged to have been sustained by plaintiff through the negligence of defendant. The second to recover for loss of services.

1Opinion of the Court

Judgment in each case reversed on the dissenting opinion of Miller, J., below, and new trial granted, costs to abide event.

Concur: Willard Bartlett, Ch. J., Chase, Cuddeback, Hogan and Seabury, JJ. Dissenting: Hiscock, J. Not sitting: Miller, J.

2Cited by16 opinions

  1. McNamara v. . LeipzigNew York Court of Appeals · 1919
  2. Cannon v. . FargoNew York Court of Appeals · 1918
  3. Claim of Schweitzer v. Thompson & Norris Co. of New JerseyNew York Court of Appeals · 1920
  4. Carr v. BurkeAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1918
  5. Stapleton v. ButenskyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1919

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API