Legal Opinion
Apple, Inc. v. Psystar Corp.
District Court, N.D. California
Decided November 13, 2009No. C 08-03251 WHAPublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER RE CROSS MOTIONS FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT
WILLIAM ALSUP, District Judge.
INTRODUCTION
In this copyright-infringement action, plaintiff Apple, Inc. and defendant Psystar Corporation have filed cross motions for summary judgment. For the following reasons, Apple’s motion is Granted and Psystar’s motion is Denied.
STATEMENT
Plaintiff Apple Inc. launched its Macintosh computer in 1984 and its Mac OS X operating system in 2001. Apple has manufactured an exclusive line of personal computers, including the Mac Pro, iMac, Mac mini, MacBook, MacBook Air, and MacBook Pro. Mac computers have been sold with…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Keenan v. AllanCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1996
- Metro-Goldwyn-Mayer Studios Inc. v. Grokster, Ltd.Supreme Court of the United States · 2005
- A&M Records, Inc. v. Napster, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2001
- Sega Enterprises Ltd., a Japanese Corporation v. Accolade, Inc., a California CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1993
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Craigslist, Inc. v. NATUREMARKET, INC.District Court, N.D. California · 2010
- Apple Inc. v. Psystar Corp.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2011
- The Upper Deck Company v. FloresDistrict Court, S.D. California · 2021
- WebPros International, LLC v. AsliDistrict Court, D. Oregon · 2024
- Yout LLC v. Recording Industry Association of America, Inc.District Court, D. Connecticut · 2022