Legal Opinion

PICHARDO AND BRUGMAN

Board of Immigration Appeals

Decided July 1, 1976No. ID 2479Published

1Opinion of the Court

Interim Decision #2479 MATTER OF PICHARDO AND BRUGMAN In Visa Petition Proceedings A-20581862 A-20581864 Decided by Board March 5, 1976 Since the law a' the Dominican Republic on mutual consent divorce obtained by foreigners does not state that both parties to such a divorce must be foreigners in order to render applicable the exception of the waiting period for pronouncement, in the absence of any evidence to the contrary, it is concluded that a mutual consent divorce obtained in the Dominican Republic in which one of the parties is a foreigner may be pronounced at any time. Hence, the…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Rosenstiel v. RosenstielNew York Court of Appeals · 1965
  2. PHILLISBoard of Immigration Appeals · 1975
  3. DARWISHBoard of Immigration Appeals · 1973
  4. Lehrer v. WallaceAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1965
  5. TAGLEBoard of Immigration Appeals · 1976

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API