Legal Opinion

New Jersey Ins. Co. v. Ball

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided January 23, 1929No. 21124PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJones, J.

The subsequent insurer was not made a party to the original action. The condition in the policy of the New Jersey Company, the first insurer, provided that its insurance should be null and void, in case of loss, if there were “any other insurance covering against the risks assumed by this policy which would attach if this insurance had not been effected. ’ ’ While the trial court thought that there was some ambiguity in this clause, we are unable to come to that conclusion. The language is quite plain. This contract stipulation clearly voided the policy if at the time of loss there was other…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Northern Assurance Co. v. Grand View Building Assn.Supreme Court of the United States · 1902
  2. New Brunswick Fire Insurance v. Morris Plan BankSupreme Court of Virginia · 1923
  3. Interstate Automobile Ins. Co. v. EdensCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1921

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. In Re HaasUnited States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Ohio · 1987
  2. Grace v. Westchester Fire Ins.Ohio Court of Appeals · 1964
  3. James Shouse v. Indiana Lumbermens Mutual Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1966
  4. Shouse v. Indiana Lumbermens Mutual Ins.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1966

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API