Legal Opinion

Schudmak v. Prince Phillip Partnership

Louisiana Court of Appeal

Decided January 16, 1991No. 90-CA-564PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

573 So.2d 547 (1991)

Carol Abramson, Wife of/and Samuel E. SCHUDMAK, III

v.

The PRINCE PHILLIP PARTNERSHIP, et al.

No. 90-CA-564.

Court of Appeal of Louisiana, Fifth Circuit.

January 16, 1991.

Anne Lacour Neeb, D. Michael Dendy, Gretna, for plaintiffs-appellants, Carol and Samuel E. Schudmak, III.

Philip A. Franco, Lindsey M. Bailleux, Adams and Reese, New Orleans, for defendant-appellee, Pelican Homestead & Sav. Ass'n.

Before BOWES, GAUDIN and GOTHARD, JJ.

BOWES, Judge.

Plaintiffs, Carol Abramson, wife of/and Samuel E. Schudmak, III (hereinafter Schudmak) filed suit for "Declaratory Judgment and…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Chaisson v. DomingueSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1979
  2. Sanders v. Hercules Sheet Metal, Inc.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1980
  3. Noe v. RousselSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1975
  4. Owen v. OwenSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1976
  5. Verrett v. Cameron Telephone Co.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1982

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Neeb v. GraffagninoLouisiana Court of Appeal · 2014
  2. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. v. ThompsonLouisiana Court of Appeal · 2014
  3. McClain v. NMP, LLCLouisiana Court of Appeal · 2018
  4. In re LeBlancUnited States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Louisiana · 2018
  5. Murchison v. TrammelLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1999

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API