People v. Gonzales
California Supreme Court
Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court of Del Norte County, and from an order refusing a new trial. The facts are stated in the-opinion.
1Opinion of the Court
Foote, C.
The defendant was convicted of murder in the first degree; from the judgment therein, and an order denying him a new trial, he has appealed.
His first contention is, that the court erred in allowing the statements of a Miss Umphlet and of her little daughter (made to divers persons after the alleged crime had been committed by the defendant, and when he was not present) to he given in evidence by those who had heard Miss Umphlet and the daughter make them.
The declarations, as detailed by Dr. Thorworth, at page 40 of the transcript, were: “ Miss Umphlet [that is, the deceased’s mother]…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- People v. AndersonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1872
- People v. AleckCalifornia Supreme Court · 1882
- People v. EnglishCalifornia Supreme Court · 1877
3Cited by28 opinions
- People v. ConklingCalifornia Supreme Court · 1896
- People v. SchmitzCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1908
- People v. SalingCalifornia Supreme Court · 1972
- People v. BruggyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1892
- State v. MillerOregon Supreme Court · 1903
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.