Legal Opinion

Star Motor Co. of California v. United States

United States Court of Claims

Decided June 16, 1930No. K-29PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BOOTH, Chief Justice.

This is a suit to recover an alleged illegal excise tax, assessed and collected from the plaintiff under the following state of facts:

The plaintiff from October 1, 1922, to June 1, 1924, manufactured and sold auto*903mobiles. Its place of business was Oakland, Cal. In July, 1924, the Commissioner of Internal Revenue, following an audit of plaintiffs tax returns, assessed additional excise taxes against the plaintiff to the amount of $121,409.61, to which was added a penalty of $6,070.49 and interest in the sum'of $11,949.-99. The plaintiff concedes an excise tax liability of…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. United States v. Missouri Pacific RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1929
  2. Lash's Products Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1929
  3. United States v. United Verde Copper Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1905
  4. J. Hungerford Smith Grape Juice Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1927

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Starr International Company, Inc v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2015
  2. Hall-Scott Motor Car Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1933
  3. Northeast Mental Health-Mental Retardation Commission v. V.M. ClevelandMississippi Supreme Court · 2016

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API