Legal Opinion

Alberts v. Lytle

California Court of Appeal

Decided October 31, 1934No. Civ. 8696PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

PACHT, J., pro tem.

About 1 A. M. of the fifteenth day of December, 1929, while the plaintiff was standing between a fire plug and a light post on the southwest corner of Vermont Avenue and Monroe Street in the city of Los Angeles, a collision occurred between a street car owned and operated by the defendant, Los Angeles Railway Corporation, and an automobile owned by the defendant Earl D. Lytle, and operated by his son, Kenneth Lytle. As a result of this collision the automobile swerved or skidded onto the sidewalk, struck the plaintiff and inflicted upon him very serious injuries for which,…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Lafargue v. United Railroad of San FranciscoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1920
  2. Donat v. DillonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1923
  3. Arnold v. San Francisco-Oakland Terminal RailwaysCalifornia Supreme Court · 1917
  4. Aydlott v. Key System Transit Co.California Court of Appeal · 1930
  5. Billig v. Southern Pacific Co.California Supreme Court · 1923

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Taylor v. Oakland Scavenger Co.California Supreme Court · 1941
  2. People v. GonzalesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1942
  3. Wills v. JJ Newberry Co.California Court of Appeal · 1941
  4. Weisbart v. FlohrCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1968
  5. Pandolfo v. JacksonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1936

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API