Legal Opinion

Schmukler v. Raynes Realty Corp.

New York Supreme Court

Decided April 19, 1930PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtFrankenthaler, J.

The plaintiff’s lease permits her to use the demised premises “ only for a modern confectionery, toys, stationery and cigar store,” and contains a covenant by the landlord “ not to rent any other store in said building for the same line of business.” A subsequent lease of a store in the same building to the defendant The Great Atlantic and Pacific Tea Company is only “ for the purpose of a general merchandise business, unrestricted, including groceries, smoked and fresh meats, poultry, fish, fresh fruits, vegetables,. candy, cigars and cigarettes.” Concededly some of the articles *321sold by the…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Peoples Trust Co. v. Schultz Novelty & Sporting Goods Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1926
  2. Butterick Publishing Co. v. Fulton & Elm Leasing Co.New York Supreme Court · 1928

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Krikorian v. DaileySupreme Court of Virginia · 1938
  2. Supreme Finance Corp. v. Burnee Corp.Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 1933

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API