Bennefield v. State
Supreme Court of Alabama
1Opinion of the Court
HARWOOD, Justice.
As we deduce from the opinion of the Court of Appeals there was introduced over appellant’s objection, a transcript of an interrogation conducted by Detective Beeker.. This transcription was prepared by Miss: Harrington from shorthand notes made by her during the interrogation. The transcription was never seen by the appellant after its preparation, nor acknowledged by the appellant to be a correct account of his: statement to Beeker.
The Court of Appeals held:
“There is no merit in appellant’s contention that this transcription should have been signed and/or acknowledged', by…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Johnson v. New JerseySupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Blue v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1944
- Acklen's v. HickmanSupreme Court of Alabama · 1879
- Parsons v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1948
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by23 opinions
- Gwin v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1982
- Kennedy v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1984
- Sanders v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1982
- State v. MayhewSupreme Court of Iowa · 1969
- Ex Parte GaddySupreme Court of Alabama · 1997
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.