Legal Opinion

United States v. Andre Swinton

Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit

Decided June 23, 2003No. 01-1004PublishedCited by 66 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

SLOVITER, Circuit Judge.

The issue presented in this appeal is whether the rule of law announced by the Supreme Court in Apprendi v. New Jersey, 530 U.S. 466, 120 S.Ct. 2348, 147 L.Ed.2d 435 (2000), applies retroactively to cases on collateral review. The courts of appeals that have considered the issue have uniformly held that Apprendi does not apply retroactively to cases on collateral review. We also so hold. See also United States v. Jenkins, 333 F.3d 151 (3d Cir.2003).

I

BACKGROUND

Appellant Andre Swinton was charged with various drug offenses in a six-count superseding…

2Cases cited29 opinions

  1. Apprendi v. New JerseySupreme Court of the United States · 2000
  2. Gideon v. WainwrightSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  3. Gideon v. WainwrightSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  4. Teague v. LaneSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
  5. United States v. CottonSupreme Court of the United States · 2002

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by66 opinions

  1. Michael Donald Dodd v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2004
  2. Hughes v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 2005
  3. Garry D. Lloyd v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2005
  4. United States v. Chang HongCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2011
  5. United States v. Thomas ReyesCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2014

61 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API