Legal Opinion · Concurrence

Helix Energy Solutions Group, Inc. v. Howard

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided November 13, 2014No. 14-14-00442-CVPublished

1ConcurrenceJ. Brett Busby, Justice

I join Justice Christopher’s majority opinion for the Court in full. I write separately to provide further explanation for my conclusion that expedited court determination of maintenance and cure is a procedural rather than a substantive feature of federal maritime law, and thus it does not preempt applicable Texas procedures.

As my colleagues’ opinions explain, the federal courts are divided regarding when and under what circumstances a court may compel a seaman’s employer to pay the seaman maintenance and cure. Because the federal decisions often do not recount in detail the procedural…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Fitzgerald v. United States Lines Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1963
  2. Brown v. Parker Drilling Offshore Corp.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2005
  3. Richard Tate v. American Tugs, Inc. And Underwriters at Lloyd's of London, DefendantsCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1981
  4. In Re GlobalSanteFe Corp.Texas Supreme Court · 2008
  5. Ralph Hall v. Diamond M CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1984

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API