Legal Opinion

Kirschenbaum v. Rubin

New York Supreme Court

Decided October 6, 1926Published

1Opinion of the CourtDike, J.

The motion here made is for an order vacating and setting aside judgment of foreclosure and sale made on July 24, 1926, on the ground that notice of said application was not properly served upon the defendant or her attorney, etc. The,error urged is as follows: That on July 19, 1926, the attorney for the defendant received through the mails a paper from the attorney for the plaintiff, purporting to be a notice of motion for judgment herein, which contained no return day of said motion, that part of the notice reading, “ On the [blank] day of July, 1926, at 10 o’clock in the forenoon of that…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. People ex rel. Rosenquest v. DonnellyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1915
  2. De Groot v. Morwick Construction Co.New York Supreme Court · 1917
  3. Kelly v. SearingNew York Supreme Court · 1857

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API