Legal Opinion

State v. Lingo

Court of Appeals of Washington

Decided July 27, 1982No. 4992-9-IIPublishedCited by 24 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtPetrie, J.

Defendants, Ben and Michael Lingo, appeal from convictions of first degree rape. Both Ben and Michael were represented by the same trial counsel. After a guilty verdict on first degree rape, Michael obtained substitute counsel for purposes of appeal. Both defendants assign as error (1) whether a search warrant was overly broad and (2) whether the admission of photographs of the victim's injuries was in error. Additionally, Michael argues on appeal that he was denied his right to speedy trial and that the dual representation of both defendants constituted ineffective assistance of counsel. We…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Cuyler v. SullivanSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
  2. State v. AdamsWashington Supreme Court · 1969
  3. State v. GriffithWashington Supreme Court · 1958
  4. State v. WhiteWashington Supreme Court · 1980
  5. State v. HagaCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1973

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by24 opinions

  1. State v. ClarkWashington Supreme Court · 2001
  2. State v. BennerOhio Supreme Court · 1988
  3. State v. PerroneWashington Supreme Court · 1992
  4. State v. WhiteCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1995
  5. State v. JamesCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1987

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API