Legal Opinion

Masters v. Bissett

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided June 27, 1990No. A8407-04448; CA A41367; A8407-04139; CA A41367; A8407-04366; CA A44881PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtButtler, P. J.

In their petition for review, which we treat as a petition for reconsideration, ORAP 9.15, grandchildren contend that they had standing to claim damages for diminution of their grandmother’s estate by excessive and improper expenses incurred by defendant trustee in what is referred to by the parties as the “Anderson matter.” In a footnote, we stated that that contention was neither pleaded nor litigated in the trial court. Masters v. Bissett (A41367)(A44881), 101 Or App 163, 174 n 8, 790 P2d 16 (1990). On reconsideration, we conclude that the issue appears to have been litigated in the trial…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Masters v. BissettCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1990

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Pereira v. Farace - concurrenceCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2005
  2. Pereira v. Farace - concurrenceCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2005

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API