Legal Opinion

DeLaFé v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided September 18, 2013No. 1D13-2472PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Per curiam

This is the second appeal arising from the denial of Appellant’s August 2010 post-conviction motion filed pursuant to Florida Criminal Procedure Rule 3.850. In the first appeal, we affirmed the denial of all but one of Appellant’s claims — that the trial court imposed an illegal upward departure sentence under Apprendi v. New Jersey, 530 U.S. 466, 120 S.Ct. 2348, 147 L.Ed.2d 435 (2000), and Blakely v. Washington, 542 U.S. 296, 124 S.Ct. 2531, 159 L.Ed.2d 403 (2004). We remanded the Apprendi/Blakely claim, and directed the postconviction court to conclusively show Appellant is not entitled to…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Apprendi v. New JerseySupreme Court of the United States · 2000
  2. Blakely v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
  3. Galindez v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 2007
  4. Hawkins v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1988
  5. Peter v. State ex rel. Department of InsuranceDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1996

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Wilson Brandon Scott v. State of FloridaDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2018

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API