Legal Opinion

United States v. Murray

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided June 10, 1981No. 61600PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Carley, Judge.

Resolution of the issues presented in the instant garnishment case requires that we interpret federal law and apply that interpretation to a rather complex set of underlying facts.

38 USCA § 3105 provides in part: “Any person who is receiving pay pursuant to any provision of law providing retired or retirement pay to persons in the Armed Forces,..., and who would be eligible to receive pension or compensation under the laws administered by the Veterans’ Administration if he were not receiving such retired or retirement pay, shall be entitled to receive such pension or…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. In Re Marriage of MilhanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1980

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Cassinelli v. Cassinelli (In re Cassinelli), California Court of Appeal, 5th District2018
  2. Veterans' Administration v. KeeCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1985
  3. Garnishment Under the Child Support Enforcement Act of Compensation Payable by the Department of Veterans Affairs, Department of Justice Office of Legal Counsel1989
  4. Warren v. WarrenCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1981

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API