Legal Opinion

Liberty Mutual Fire Insurance Co. v. Hubbard

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided July 15, 1976PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBryson, J.

The plaintiff, subrogated to the rights of its insured, Farm Machinery, Inc., brought this action to recover $14,000 which it paid for the insured’s combine equipment destroyed by fire. Plaintiff’s complaint alleged two grounds for recovery in separate counts: (1) common law bailment; (2) a written contract for rental of the combine. The trial court granted defendants’ motion for involuntary nonsuit as to the second count and submitted the case to the jury on the first count. Judgment was entered in favor of defendants on the jury’s verdict, and plaintiff appeals.

Plaintiff first contends that…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Hansen v. Oregon-Wash. R. & N. Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1920
  2. Marnon v. Vaughan Motor Co., Inc.Oregon Supreme Court · 1947
  3. National Fire Ins. Co. v. MoganOregon Supreme Court · 1949
  4. Carothers v. CarothersOregon Supreme Court · 1971
  5. Cameron v. Edgemont Investment Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1935

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Brand S Corp. v. KingIdaho Supreme Court · 1981
  2. Roberts v. Mitchell Bros. Truck LinesOregon Supreme Court · 1980
  3. Gaha v. Taylor-Johnson Dodge, Inc.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 1981
  4. State Ex Rel. Vandenberg v. VandenbergCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1980
  5. Compton v. DanielsIdaho Supreme Court · 1978

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API