C.F. and M.F., individually and on behalf of their daughter V.F. v. COUNCIL ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT
District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania
1Opinion
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA C.F. and M.F., individually and on behalf of their daughter V.F., Civil No. 24-402 Plaintiffs, v. COUNCIL ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT, Defendant. MEMORANDUM Costello, J. June 22, 2026 V.F., a child with autism, a speech impairment, and Cortical Visual Impairment (“CVI”),1 received special education services from Defendant Council Rock School District. C.F. and M.F., on behalf of V.F. (the “Plaintiffs”), filed a due process complaint with the Pennsylvania Office of Dispute Resolution (“ODR”) contending that Defendant did not…
2Cases cited25 opinions
- Board of Education of the Hendrick Hudson Central School District v. Rowley Ex Rel. RowleySupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Honig v. DoeSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
- Ridgewood Board of Education v. N.E., as Guardian Ad Litem for M.E., an Infant Mary E., Individually and as Guardian Ad Litem for M.E., an Infant, Defendants/third-Party v. Frederick Stokley, Superintendent John Campion, Director of Special Programs Charles Abate, Principal William Ward, Principal Lorraine Zak, Psychologist Kathleen McNally Social Worker Caroline Janover, Ldt-C George Neville, Principal Henry Hogue, Psychologist June Ann Dibb, Dr., Psychiatrist Joan Christian, Ldt-C Susan Lynaugh, Psychologist, Third-Party N.E., as Guardian Ad Litem for M.E., an Infant Mary E., Individually and as Guardian Ad Litem for M.E., an InfantCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1999
- Chambers v. School District of Philadelphia Board of EducationCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2009
- D.E. v. Central Dauphin School DistrictCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2014
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.