Legal Opinion

Texas Company v. Foreman

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided September 18, 1934No. 25287PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBayless, J.

This is an original proceeding to review an award of the State Industrial Commission in favor of Eddie Foreman, respondent herein, but hereinafter called claimant.

The claimant, while cleaning a still for petitioner, the Texas Company, at its Tulsa, Okla., refinery, got some particles of brick in his left eye. Claimant, by the use of his hands and a cloth or rag provided by petitioners, removed some of the particles of brick from his eye, and immediately received first-aid treatment from a nurse employed by petitioner, and the following morning went to and received treatment from a physician.…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Whitfield v. Canadian Valley Utilities Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1927
  2. Amerada Petroleum Co. v. WilliamsSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1927
  3. Davison v. Wilson & Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1927
  4. Williams v. Black-Sivalls BrysonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1927

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. B. & M. Construction Co. v. AnglinSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1939
  2. Frick-Reid Supply Co. v. HunterSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1935
  3. National Zinc Co. v. VandgrifftSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1939

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API