Legal Opinion

People v. Superior Court (Kim)

California Court of Appeal

Decided November 30, 1993No. G014181PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

SILLS, P. J.

We are faced here with an interesting paradox. It is well established a capital offense is one which carries the maximum possible penalty of death. It is also well established a person under the age of 18 years cannot, by law, be punished with the death penalty. Petitioner asks us to hold that Kim—a minor—faces a capital offense because, although he cannot, by law, be punished with the death penalty, the offense with which he is charged carries that maximum penalty. Acknowledging the test for determining a capital offense is to focus on the maximum penalty, without regard…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Schall v. MartinSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. People v. AndersonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1972
  3. People v. RolloCalifornia Supreme Court · 1977
  4. Sand v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1983
  5. United States v. James A. WatsonCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1973

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. In Re AlbertoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2002
  2. State v. AmeerNew Mexico Supreme Court · 2018
  3. State v. AmeerNew Mexico Supreme Court · 2018
  4. People v. Valdez CA5California Court of Appeal · 2015

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API