People v. Superior Court (Kim)
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
SILLS, P. J.
We are faced here with an interesting paradox. It is well established a capital offense is one which carries the maximum possible penalty of death. It is also well established a person under the age of 18 years cannot, by law, be punished with the death penalty. Petitioner asks us to hold that Kim—a minor—faces a capital offense because, although he cannot, by law, be punished with the death penalty, the offense with which he is charged carries that maximum penalty. Acknowledging the test for determining a capital offense is to focus on the maximum penalty, without regard…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Schall v. MartinSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- People v. AndersonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1972
- People v. RolloCalifornia Supreme Court · 1977
- Sand v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1983
- United States v. James A. WatsonCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1973
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- In Re AlbertoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2002
- State v. AmeerNew Mexico Supreme Court · 2018
- State v. AmeerNew Mexico Supreme Court · 2018
- People v. Valdez CA5California Court of Appeal · 2015