Goldfield-Mohawk Mining Co. v. Frances-Mohawk Mining & Leasing Co.
Nevada Supreme Court
Appeal from the District Court of the First Judicial District of tbe State of Nevada, Esmeralda County; F. P. Langan, Judge. Action by the Goldfield-Mohawk Mining Company against the Frances-Mohawk Mining and Leasing Company and others, and another action by the same plaintiff against D. Mackenzie & Co. From an order in each case discharging an attachment, plaintiff appeals. The facts sufficiently appear in the opinion.
1Opinion of the Court
By the Court,
Talbot, J.:
Both of these actions were brought to recover damages alleged to have resulted from caving, caused by the improper working by the defendants of mining ground, in violation of *350the terms of the lease given to the defendants’ assignors by plaintiff. The legal questions involved are similar in both cases, and have been argued and submitted together. Attachments for the amounts claimed, respectively, $100,000 and $25,000, were issued and levied, and moneys of the defendants on deposit in bank, about $250,000 belonging to D. Mackenzie & Co., and about $750,000 belonging to…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Kelley v. McFaddenIndiana Supreme Court · 1881
- Sallee v. WatersSupreme Court of Alabama · 1850
- Boykin v. EdwardsSupreme Court of Alabama · 1852
- Cummings v. HyattNebraska Supreme Court · 1898
- Griffin v. SutherlandNew York Supreme Court · 1852
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Caldwell v. Nelson (In Re Caldwell)United States Bankruptcy Appellate Panel for the Ninth Circuit · 2016
- Van Meter v. NilssonNevada Supreme Court · 2013
- AGUIRRE, JR. v. ELKO CTY. SHERIFF'S OFFICENevada Supreme Court · 2022
- Goldfield-Mohawk Mining Co. v. D. Mackenzie & Co.Nevada Supreme Court · 1909
- In re NilssonNevada Supreme Court · 2013