Legal Opinion

Heradia v. Goord

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided May 9, 2002PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

—Proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 (transferred to this Court by order of the Supreme Court, entered in Albany County) to review a determination of respondent which found petitioner guilty of violating a prison disciplinary rule.

Petitioner was found guilty of violating the prison disciplin*698ary rule prohibiting the unauthorized use of controlled substances after his urine tested positive for the presence of cannabinoids and opiates. Substantial evidence of petitioner’s guilt was presented at his disciplinary hearing in the form of the detailed misbehavior report and the testimony of the…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Maldonado v. GoordAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2000
  2. Alston v. Great Meadow Correctional FacilityAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1998
  3. Ellison v. GoordAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2000
  4. Moley v. SelskyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1997
  5. Martinez v. RossAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1997

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Borcsok v. SelskyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2002
  2. Cane v. GoordAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2002

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API