Legal Opinion

Berry-Kofron Dental Laboratory Co. v. Smith

Supreme Court of Missouri

Decided February 21, 1940PublishedCited by 21 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Action for declaratory judgment by which plaintiff sought to have the court declare it not to be engaged in the business of selling tangible personal property at retail, as defined by the Sales Tax Act of 1937, page 552 et seq., particularly Section 1, paragraph g and Section 2, paragraph a, and not subject to the provisions of the act relative to assessment and collection of the tax; also that Rule 57 promulgated by the State Auditor, so far as it applies to plaintiff, is invalid. Defendants by their answer assert that plaintiff is subject to the tax, that on the facts stated in plaintiff's…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Bellerive Investment Co. v. Kansas CitySupreme Court of Missouri · 1929
  2. Revzan v. NudelmanIllinois Supreme Court · 1938
  3. State Ex Rel. Ford Motor Co. v. GehnerSupreme Court of Missouri · 1930
  4. City of St. Louis v. SmithSupreme Court of Missouri · 1938
  5. State Ex Rel. Kansas City Power & Light Co. v. SmithSupreme Court of Missouri · 1938

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by21 opinions

  1. Witherspoon v. Sides Const. Co., Inc.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1985
  2. Kilbane v. Director of the Department of RevenueSupreme Court of Missouri · 1976
  3. State Ex Rel. Dravo Corporation v. SpradlingSupreme Court of Missouri · 1974
  4. Burlington Northern Railroad v. Director of RevenueSupreme Court of Missouri · 1990
  5. Gaddy v. State Board of Registration for the Healing ArtsMissouri Court of Appeals · 1965

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API