Legal Opinion

Smith v. Dunman

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided January 31, 1895No. 734PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

GARRETT, Chief Justice.

— This was an action of trespass to try title brought by the appellees, as heirs of Daniel Dunman, deceased, to recover of George E. Smith, the appellant, lot number 3 in the partition of the Martin Dunman survey, in Galveston County, between Elizabeth, the widow of Martin Dunman, deceased, and their children. The partition was made in 1854, and lot 3 was set apart to Susan Holt, a daughter, and was conveyed by her to Daniel Dunman. Let 2 of said partition was set apart to Daniel Dunman. To the widow, Elizabeth Dunman, one-half of the survey wás allotted. Daniel Dunman…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Hinson v. Ely Walker & Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1885
  2. International & Great Northern Railway Co. v. McRaeTexas Supreme Court · 1891

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Acker v. ThompsonCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1939
  2. Erwin v. WhiteCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1936
  3. Howorth v. CarterCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1900
  4. Hightower Bros. v. Taylor Co., LimitedCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1910

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API