Legal Opinion
State v. Brady
Arizona Supreme Court
Decided May 14, 1970No. 1971PublishedCited by 14 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
LOCKWOOD, Chief Justice.
The defendant, Rudolph Brady, was convicted by a jury .of two counts of possession of narcotics (heroin) in violation of A.R.S. § 36-1002. He received concurrent sentences of not less than two nor more more than five years on each count. He appeals.
On May 13, 1968, State Narcotics Agents obtained a warrant to search the premises of a person known only as “Bernie” located at 672 N. Anita, Apartment 5, in Tucson, Arizona. With the warrant, Agents Richardson Heinze and Dierking proceeded to the apartment. None of the agents were in uniform. Thy were dressed in undercover…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Townsend v. SainSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- Miller v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1958
- Sullivan v. State of ArizonaArizona Supreme Court · 1936
- Robert McClure Jr., and Donald Gaxiola v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1964
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- State v. NordstromArizona Supreme Court · 2001
- State v. BatesArizona Supreme Court · 1978
- State v. EminowiczCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1974
- State v. LaPonsieCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1982
- State v. PorterArizona Supreme Court · 1979
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.