Legal Opinion

Generotzky v. Barnay Hotel Co.

New Jersey Court of Chancery

Decided October 19, 1915PublishedCited by 2 opinions

On hearing on return of order to show cause why certain money should not be surrendered to receiver.

1Opinion of the Court

Teaming, Y. C.

The facts herein are not in dispute. On the da.y that a receiver of the Bamay Hotel Company was appointed, but after the order, of appointment had been made, a distress warrant was issued by the owner of the hotel occupied by the insolvent corporation and certain money of the insolvent corporation was thereunder seized and taken from the safe in the office of the corporation. The parties who seized the money were at the time apprised of the fact that a receiver in insolvency had been appointed. The money is still held intact awaiting the determina^ti on of the rights of the…

2Cited by2 opinions

  1. Hoffman v. KahnNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1935
  2. TR. OF CLIENTS'SEC. FUND v. YuchtNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1989

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API