Generotzky v. Barnay Hotel Co.
New Jersey Court of Chancery
On hearing on return of order to show cause why certain money should not be surrendered to receiver.
1Opinion of the Court
Teaming, Y. C.
The facts herein are not in dispute. On the da.y that a receiver of the Bamay Hotel Company was appointed, but after the order, of appointment had been made, a distress warrant was issued by the owner of the hotel occupied by the insolvent corporation and certain money of the insolvent corporation was thereunder seized and taken from the safe in the office of the corporation. The parties who seized the money were at the time apprised of the fact that a receiver in insolvency had been appointed. The money is still held intact awaiting the determina^ti on of the rights of the…
2Cited by2 opinions
- Hoffman v. KahnNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1935
- TR. OF CLIENTS'SEC. FUND v. YuchtNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1989