Winfield v. State
Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas
1DissentDavidson, Judge
On Appellant’s Second Motion for Rehearing
That the jury commissioners, in drawing the jury panel from which was selected the jury that tried and convicted the appellant, arbitrarily and intentionally failed to select and refused to select or consider *769women for jury service on that panel is not disputed.
In sustaining the action of the trial court in overruling appellant’s challenge to the array, my brethren do so upon the proposition that appellant — being a male person and not a member of the class which was discriminated against — could not complain of a denial of equal protection to women…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- McNabb v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1943
- Thiel v. Southern Pacific Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1946
- Ballard v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1946
- Fay v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
- Fann v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1940
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.