Legal Opinion

State v. DeLao

Court of Appeals of Wisconsin

Decided May 2, 2001No. 00-1638-CRPublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSnyder, J.

¶ 1. Media DeLao appeals from a judgment of conviction for obstructing a police officer, possession of a short-barreled shotgun and harbor ing/aiding a felon, and from an order denying her motion for postconviction relief. DeLao makes three arguments in favor of her appeal: (1) the State should not have been allowed to amend the information after the close of evidence; (2) the State violated discovery rules by failing to provide DeLao with her previous statements and should not have been allowed to impeach her with said statements; and (3) the jury should not have been allowed to discontinue…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Jones v. StateWisconsin Supreme Court · 1975
  2. State v. WildCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1988
  3. State v. MartinezCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1991

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. State v. DeLaoWisconsin Supreme Court · 2002
  2. State v. LongCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 2002
  3. State v. DeLaoWisconsin Supreme Court · 2002
  4. State v. DeLaoWisconsin Supreme Court · 2002

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API