State v. DeLao
Court of Appeals of Wisconsin
1Opinion of the CourtSnyder, J.
¶ 1. Media DeLao appeals from a judgment of conviction for obstructing a police officer, possession of a short-barreled shotgun and harbor ing/aiding a felon, and from an order denying her motion for postconviction relief. DeLao makes three arguments in favor of her appeal: (1) the State should not have been allowed to amend the information after the close of evidence; (2) the State violated discovery rules by failing to provide DeLao with her previous statements and should not have been allowed to impeach her with said statements; and (3) the jury should not have been allowed to discontinue…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Jones v. StateWisconsin Supreme Court · 1975
- State v. WildCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1988
- State v. MartinezCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1991
3Cited by4 opinions
- State v. DeLaoWisconsin Supreme Court · 2002
- State v. LongCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 2002
- State v. DeLaoWisconsin Supreme Court · 2002
- State v. DeLaoWisconsin Supreme Court · 2002