Legal Opinion

Ganley v. City of Chicago

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided February 26, 1980No. 79-461PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Downing

Plaintiffs, James and Mary Ganley, brought this action to enjoin defendants, city of Chicago and its commissioners of the departments of buildings, and of streets and sanitation (the city), from revoking and withholding building and driveway permits for the construction of a single-family residence. The city defended on the ground that the construction site purchased by the Ganleys does not meet the minimum bulk requirement for the zoning district and, therefore, the permits were illegally issued. After a nonjury trial, the circuit court found for the Ganleys and held the city was estopped…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Cities Service Oil Co. v. City of Des PlainesIllinois Supreme Court · 1961
  2. Ganley v. City of ChicagoAppellate Court of Illinois · 1974
  3. O'LAUGHLIN v. City of ChicagoIllinois Supreme Court · 1976
  4. City of Chicago v. ZellersAppellate Court of Illinois · 1965
  5. Emerald Home Builders, Inc. v. KoltonAppellate Court of Illinois · 1973

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Bank of Pawnee v. JoslinAppellate Court of Illinois · 1988
  2. Constantine v. Village of Glen EllynAppellate Court of Illinois · 1991
  3. City of Chicago v. RoppoloAppellate Court of Illinois · 1983
  4. Wadden v. Village of WoodridgeAppellate Court of Illinois · 1990
  5. Heerey v. City of Des PlainesAppellate Court of Illinois · 1992

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API