Legal Opinion

People v. Francois

New York Court of Appeals

Decided February 11, 2010No. 84 SSM 62PublishedCited by 25 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

Memorandum.

The order of the Appellate Division should be affirmed.

The Appellate Division’s determination that the officer’s conduct did not elevate his encounter with defendant from a common-law inquiry to a seizure necessitating reasonable suspicion constitutes a resolution of a mixed question of law and fact that is supported by the record evidence (see generally People v Wheeler, 2 NY3d 370, 373 [2004]), and is therefore beyond this Court’s further power of review (see People v Battaglia, 86 NY2d 755, 756 [1995]).

Chief Judge Lippman and Judges Ciparick, Graffeo, Read,…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. People v. BattagliaNew York Court of Appeals · 1995
  2. People v. WheelerNew York Court of Appeals · 2004

3Cited by25 opinions

  1. People v. PaigeNew York Court of Appeals · 2011
  2. People v. Donald R.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2015
  3. People v. SmallAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2017
  4. People v. MonteroAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2015
  5. People v. NonniAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2015

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API