Cieliczka v. Johnson
District Court, E.D. Michigan
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
FEIKENS, District Judge.
Facts
Plaintiff served in the armed forces of the United States from 1942 through 1945. In December 1945, following his discharge, he filed a claim for disability benefits because of flat feet. This claim was denied. In 1948 the case was reopened, and his condition was found to be service connected but nondisabling, and therefore noncompensable.
Plaintiff claims that additional medical evidence was necessary for him either to appeal this decision effectively or to later reopen the case. Because he could not afford the examinations and reports which…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Dandridge v. WilliamsSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
- Griffin v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1956
- San Antonio Independent School District v. RodriguezSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Douglas v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- Loving v. VirginiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Cieliczka v. JohnsonDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 1973