Legal Opinion

In re Nadeau

Court of Appeals of Minnesota

Decided June 9, 1987No. C3-87-582Published

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

POPOVICH, Chief Judge.

Yvonne Nadeau seeks review of a March 1987 commitment as a mentally ill person, arguing there was insufficient, evidence to show she is dangerous to herself or others. We affirm.

FACTS

Yvonne Nadeau has been committed as a mentally ill person on two prior occasions. In 1985, when this court reviewed the second commitment, we held the evidence was insufficient to support the finding Nadeau posed a substantial likelihood of harm to herself or others. In re Nadeau, 375 N.W.2d 85 (Minn.Ct.App.1985). Nadeau now argues the findings and order for her third commitment are…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. O'Connor v. DonaldsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
  2. In Re NadeauCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1985

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API