Legal Opinion

Due v. W. T. Rawleigh Co.

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided February 16, 1933No. 2327Published

1Opinion of the Court

WALKER, Chief Justice.

Appellee, the W. T. Rawleigh Company, instituted this suit against appellant Sam H. Due, and his coappellants, W. J. Jordan, Wyatt G. Chancey, and L. W. Denman, to recover the sum of $1,156.73 for products of ap-pellee sold to appellant Due under the following contract and surety agreement:

“1. In consideration of the execution and acceptance of this agreement, and the covenants hereinafter expressed, the W. T. Raw-leigh Company, an Illinois corporation, hereinafter called the Seller, agrees to sell and deliver to the undersigned Buyer f. o. b. cars Memphis, Tennessee, or…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. President of the Bank of Alabama v. SimontonTexas Supreme Court · 1847
  2. W. T. Rawleigh Co. v. LandTexas Supreme Court · 1926
  3. Fleming v. ToddCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1931
  4. Holloway v. Memphis, El Paso & Pacific RailroadTexas Supreme Court · 1859
  5. Reliable Iron Works v. First State Bank & Trust Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1922

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API