Legal Opinion
S.L.B. v. K.A.
New York City Family Court
Decided July 16, 1992PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
Bruce M. Kaplan, J.
Respondent, by order to show cause, dated March 18, 1992, has moved for renewal of his motion to exclude DNA testing of the parties and the child C., and that upon granting of *459renewal the court amend its prior order to the extent of deleting the provision for DNA testing of the parties and child by Roche Biomedical Laboratories, Inc. (Roche).
Thereafter, petitioner’s counsel submitted an affirmation in opposition and respondent’s counsel filed a reply affirmation dated April 22, 1992.
After consideration of these papers, and after being apprised of a…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- People v. CastroNew York Supreme Court · 1989
- In re Baby Girl S.New York Surrogate's Court · 1988
- King v. TannerNew York Supreme Court · 1989
- S.L.B. v. K.A.New York City Family Court · 1992
- Shepherd v. SkeeteAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1991
3Cited by4 opinions
- In re the Estate of JanisNew York Surrogate's Court · 1993
- Department of Social Services ex rel. Ruth M. H. v. Joseph N.New York City Family Court · 1993
- People v. WesleyNew York Court of Appeals · 1994
- People v. WesleyNew York Court of Appeals · 1994