Legal Opinion

Grisso v. Crump

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided October 10, 1916No. 7675PublishedCited by 1 opinion

Error from County Court, Seminole County, A. S. Norvell, Judge. Action by George C. Crump and another) partners doing business under the style of Crump & Skinner, against AAT. E. Grisso. Judgment for plaintiffs, and defendant brings error.

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

DE GRAFFENREID, C.

Defendant in error will be denominated plaintiffs, and plaintiff in error defendant. Plaintiffs fi'ed their petition in the county court of Seminole county alleging that the defendant was indebted to them in. the sum of 8250 for legal services rendered under an oral contract with defendant, which services as such attorneys were to instituto in the dis-, trict court of Seminole county, a civil action for defendant against J. Vanbuskirk, for recovery of certain land, which suit was finally determined in favor of the defendant, Gris-so.

Defendant filed his amended…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Citizens' Bank of Wakita v. GarnettSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1908
  2. Plotner v. Chillson & ChillsonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1908
  3. Missouri Pacific Railway Co. v. PierceSupreme Court of Kansas · 1885
  4. Goodrich v. WilliamsonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1901
  5. Kingfisher Nat. Bank of Kingfisher v. JohnsonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1908

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Patterson v. Central State BankSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1919

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API