Legal Opinion

Baldwin v. Parsons

Supreme Court of Iowa

Decided February 17, 1922PublishedCited by 15 opinions

Appeal from Marshall District Court. — B. F. Cummings, Judge. Action for personal injuries occasioned by plaintiff’s being struck by an automobile driven by the defendant’s son. The court directed a verdict for the defendant, and plaintiff appeals.

1Opinion of the CourtFaville, J.

— The appellant’s petition alleges that, on or about the first day of November, 1919, the appellee was the owner of an automobile which was being operated for him and in his behalf by his son, Vern Parsons, who was at that time in the employ of the appellee, and operating said car by the authority of the appellee. The petition alleges negligence in the operation of said car, resulting in damages for which recovery is sought. The appellee filed an answer, in which he “admits that he owns a certain automobile which was being driven and operated by his son,” and pleads a general denial and…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Birch v. AbercrombieWashington Supreme Court · 1913
  2. Daily v. MaxwellMissouri Court of Appeals · 1911
  3. Norris v. . KohlerNew York Court of Appeals · 1869
  4. Stowe v. MorrisCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1912
  5. McNeal v. McKainSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1912

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Curry v. BickleySupreme Court of Iowa · 1923
  2. Foster v. FarraOregon Supreme Court · 1926
  3. Heavilin v. WendellSupreme Court of Iowa · 1932
  4. Rowland v. SpaltiSupreme Court of Iowa · 1923
  5. Napier v. PattersonSupreme Court of Iowa · 1923

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API