Strelow v. Bohr
Wisconsin Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtFritz, J.
For the consideration of the appeal of the defendants, Clement Bohr, Arthur Schoenike, and Ruth Eben-reiter, from the order denying their motion for summary judgment, and likewise a review, pursuant to plaintiffs’ notice, of that part of the order which denied their motion for a summary judgment, it suffices to note the following facts and proceedings, which appear without dispute from the pleadings and affidavits filed herein. This action is the second of two actions brought by the plaintiffs against the above-named defendants upon a contract made on May 23, 1938, between the plaintiffs and…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Hart v. MoultonWisconsin Supreme Court · 1899
- Fanning v. MurphyWisconsin Supreme Court · 1906
- Bassett v. BassettWisconsin Supreme Court · 1898
- Building Contractors' Ltd. Mutual Liability Insurance v. Southern Surety Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1924
- Urwan v. Northwestern National Life InsuranceWisconsin Supreme Court · 1905
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- United States v. Rogers & RogersDistrict Court, D. Minnesota · 1941