Peterson v. Ohio Department of Insurance

James J. Sweeney, Presiding Judge.

{¶ 1} Gary Peterson appeals from the decision of the common pleas court affirming the decision of the Ohio Department of Insurance. Peterson argues that the common pleas court’s decision was not supported by a preponderance of reliable, probative, and substantial evidence, and that the court erred as a matter of law when it affirmed the department’s order imposing two penalties for a single violation of R.C. 3945.14(B). 1 For the following reasons, we affirm.

{¶ 2} In the early 1990s, Peterson met Florence Cherrison when she became a client of the bank where…