Legal Opinion

Bolton v. Bailey

Supreme Court of Iowa

Decided February 11, 1904PublishedCited by 5 opinions

Appeal from Linn District Court. — HoN. H. M. Reihley, Judge. The appellant is tbe garnishee of tbe principal defendant, S. C. Bailey, against whom tbe plaintiff obtained a judgment in 1900. Tbe appellant answered as such garnishee, and, upon bis answer alone, judgment was rendered against him for tbe amount claimed by tbe plaintiff. He appeals.

1Opinion of the CourtSiierwiN, J.

Tbe appellant is tbe soel of S. C. Bailey, and his answer as garnishee showed tbat in 1896 bis father assigned and transferred to him, as a gift, certain notes, aggregating in amount more than tbe judgment rendered against him as garnishee. There wasjnothing in tbe appellant’s answer tending even remotely to show tbat at tbe time *730of tbe transfer of the notes to him his father was insolvent, or without sufficient property remaining in his hands to pay all of his just debts. Before the garnishment proceedings, however, the father had testified in a proceeding supplemental to execution, to which…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Strong v. LawrenceSupreme Court of Iowa · 1882
  2. Morse v. MarshallSupreme Court of Iowa · 1867
  3. Pierson v. HeiseySupreme Court of Iowa · 1865
  4. Church v. SimpsonSupreme Court of Iowa · 1868
  5. Sheppard & Co. v. DowningSupreme Court of Iowa · 1863

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Simmons v. BeesonSupreme Court of Iowa · 1926
  2. Meltzer v. ShaferSupreme Court of Iowa · 1932
  3. Bump v. AugustineSupreme Court of Iowa · 1913
  4. Staver Carriage Co. v. BeaudryAppellate Court of Illinois · 1907
  5. Bates v. KleveSupreme Court of Iowa · 1938

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API