Legal Opinion

Thomas v. DeGrace

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided September 19, 1989No. WD 41358PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

. KENNEDY, Judge.

Walter Thomas and his wife, Phileda L. Thomas, sued Rosalie DeGrace for damages for breach of contract and for fraudulent misrepresentation. At the close of all the evidence at the trial, Judge Gray directed a verdict in DeGrace’s favor against the Thomases and the Thomases have appealed from the resultant judgment.

The evidence was that Walter Thomas had contracted to buy from DeGrace a tavern with the colorful name of “The Lost Weekend”.

The contract, signed by Rosalie P. DeG-race, read in its entirety as follows:

6/26/86

I agree to Sell all Equipment in The Bar now named Lost…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Liberty Financial Management Corp. v. Beneficial Data Processing Corp.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1984
  2. Zahorsky v. Griffin, Dysart, Taylor, Penner & Lay, P.C.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1985
  3. May Department Stores Co. v. Adworks, Inc.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1987
  4. Illinois State Bank of Quincy v. YatesMissouri Court of Appeals · 1984

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Cupp v. National RR Passenger Corp.Missouri Court of Appeals · 2004
  2. Comstock v. WalshMissouri Court of Appeals · 1992
  3. Lynch v. Missouri Department of CorrectionsMissouri Court of Appeals · 2008
  4. Geller v. General Agents Insurance Co. of AmericaMissouri Court of Appeals · 1992

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API