Legal Opinion
Hindman v. Bischoff
District Court of Appeal of Florida
Decided November 2, 1988No. 88-206PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
534 So.2d 743 (1988)
Michelle HINDMAN, Appellant,
v.
Howard B. BISCHOFF, Appellee.
No. 88-206.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.
November 2, 1988.
Rehearing Denied December 6, 1988.
Michelle Hindman, pro se.
Larry K. Coleman of Mulock & Coleman, P.A., Bradenton, for appellee.
FRANK, Judge.
During her pregnancy, Michelle Hindman discussed with Howard Bischoff the possibility of placing the child for adoption. Bischoff is an attorney authorized to act as an intermediary in adoption proceedings. See Chapter 63, Fla. Stat. (1985). Hindman ultimately executed an agreement in contemplation…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- In Re Adoption of CLWDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1985
- Matter of Adoption of DoeDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1988
3Cited by5 opinions
- J.S. v. S.A.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 2005
- Hall v. HallDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1996
- In re the Adoption of Baby Girl SCircuit Court for the Judicial Circuits of Florida · 1989
- Onesko v. Adoption of B.M.O.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1992
- TR v. Adoption Services, Inc.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1999