State ex rel. Bend v. Harrison
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Order to show cause why relator should not be permitted to file an information in the nature of quo warranto against the respondent, for alleged unlawful usurpation of the powers and duties of the office of colonel of the first regiment of the state militia.
1Opinion of the CourtDickinson, J.
The relator having sought from the attorney general his official authority for the filing of an information in the nature of a quo warranto, and that officer having refused such application, the relator applied to this court for leave to file the same. Thereupon an order was granted requiring the respondent to show cause why the application should not be allowed. Through this pro*527ceeding the relator seeks to have the respondent required to show by what authority he exercises the functions of colonel of the first regiment of the national guard of this state. The matters now to be considered are…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Commonwealth v. AllenMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1880
- State ex rel. Simpson v. DowlanSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1885
- State ex rel. Murry v. MeadSupreme Court of Vermont · 1883
3Cited by5 opinions
- State ex rel. Clapp v. Minnesota Thresher Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1889
- Storer Broadcasting Company, Detroit Fire & Marine Insurance Company and Associated Aviation Underwriters v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1958
- State ex rel. Higdon v. JelksSupreme Court of Alabama · 1902
- People ex rel. Smith v. RoeAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1900
- State ex rel. Caldwell v. American Railway Express Co.South Dakota Supreme Court · 1919