Legal Opinion
Huffman v. Gaylor
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Decided February 23, 1954No. 35884PublishedCited by 15 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
WILLIAMS, Justice.
The parties are referred to herein as they appeared in the trial court.
This is an action by C. D. Gaylor against Carl Huffman to recover damages' for injury to' his automobile motor allegedly caused by the negligence of an employee of defendant while engaged in towing an automobile on-the frame of which the motor was resting, hut to which it was unattached, to defendant’s garage.
Defendant in his answer pleads that if plaintiff’s motor was damaged, which is not admitted but denied, the damage was caused by his own negligence and not by any negligence or carelessness on the…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Munroe v. Schoenfeld & Hunter Drilling Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1936
- Jafek v. Public Service Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1938
- Gibson Oil Co. v. WestbrookeSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1932
- Sand Springs Railway Co. v. PiggeeSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1945
- Henry Chevrolet Co. v. TaylorSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1940
3Cited by15 opinions
- Hobbs v. WatkinsSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1971
- Rigdon & Bruen Oil Company v. BeermanSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1959
- Gulf Oil Corporation v. HarrisSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1967
- Kelley v. Enid Terminal ElevatorsSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1962
- SINCLAIR OIL AND GAS COMPANY v. CheatwoodSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1960
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.