Watts v. Rubber Tree, Inc.
Court of Appeals of Oregon
1Opinion of the CourtWarren, P. J.
Plaintiff petitions for review of our opinion. 118 Or App 557,848 P2d 1210 (1993). We treat the petition as one for reconsideration, ORAP 9.15, and allow it but adhere to our opinion.
The main argument plaintiff raises in her petition concerns the limited warranty provided by defendant. We briefly addressed that argument in our opinion. 118 Or App at 563 n 2. The warranty reads:
“[I]f it’s a customer casing, for the first 25 percent of tread wear we’ll guarantee the cap and the casing. After the first 25 percent is worn, we’ll guarantee the cap up to 50 percent. Thereafter there is no warranty…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Markle v. Mulholland's, Inc.Oregon Supreme Court · 1973
- Watts v. Rubber Tree, Inc.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 1993
3Cited by6 opinions
- Mack v. General Electric Co.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2012
- Mason v. Mt. St. Joseph, Inc.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 2009
- Brokenshire v. Rivas and Rivas, Ltd.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 1996
- Mason v. Mt. St. Joseph, Inc.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 2009
- Two Two v. Fujitec America, Inc.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 2013
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.