Legal Opinion

Patterson v. Alexander & Hamilton, Inc.

Louisiana Court of Appeal

Decided April 2, 2003No. 2002 CA 1230PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

844 So.2d 412 (2003)

Gary PATTERSON

v.

ALEXANDER & HAMILTON, INC.

No. 2002 CA 1230.

Court of Appeal of Louisiana, First Circuit.

April 2, 2003.

Larry W. Buquoi, Craig Kimball, Prairieville, Counsel for Plaintiff/Appellee Gary Patterson.

Paul Eckert, Metairie, Counsel for Defendant/Appellant Alexander & Hamilton, Inc.

Before: KUHN, DOWNING and GAIDRY, JJ.

DOWNING, J.

This appeal addresses whether Alexander & Hamilton, Inc. (Alexander & Hamilton) wrongfully failed to pay commissions and a bonus that Gary Patterson claims to have earned. The trial court agreed that Alexander & Hamilton owed the commissions…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Herlitz Const. Co., Inc. v. Hotel Investors of New Iberia, Inc.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1981
  2. Chambers v. LeBlancSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1992
  3. Becht v. Morgan Buildings & Spas, Inc.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 2002
  4. Howser v. Carruth Mortg. Corp.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1985
  5. BAMBURG STEEL BLDS., INC. v. Lawrence Gen. Corp.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 2002

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Price v. Roy O. Martin Lumber Co.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 2005
  2. Schuyten v. Superior Systems, Inc.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 2006
  3. Graves v. AUTOMATED COMMERCIAL FUELINGLouisiana Court of Appeal · 2006
  4. U.L. Coleman Co. v. GossleeLouisiana Court of Appeal · 2017
  5. Kite Bros. LLC v. Kite RV, LLCLouisiana Court of Appeal · 2014

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API