Legal Opinion

Dan Thomas v. P. Young, B. Spitaleri and G. Wiley

Texas Court of Appeals, 9th District (Beaumont)

Decided August 26, 2004No. 09-04-00157-CVPublished

1Opinion of the Court

In The

Court of Appeals

Ninth District of Texas at Beaumont

____________________

NO. 09-04-157 CV

____________________

DAN THOMAS, Appellant

V

P. YOUNG, B. SPITALERI, AND G. WILEY, Appellees

On Appeal from the 258th District Court

Polk County, Texas

Trial Cause No. CIV 21,468

MEMORANDUM OPINION (1)

This is a restricted appeal from the denial of a petition for deposition to perpetuate testimony. In response to our jurisdictional inquiry, the appellant contends that restricted appeal is available because he did not participate in the "trial." The appellant, Dan Thomas, also filed a brief in which he…

Also in this document: Per curiam.

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Stubbs v. StubbsTexas Supreme Court · 1985
  2. Texaco, Inc. v. Central Power & Light Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1996
  3. Clopton v. Chi-Suk PakCourt of Appeals of Texas · 2001
  4. Citizens State Bank of Dickinson v. ShapiroCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1978
  5. Federated Mutual Insurance Co. v. Davenport, Texas Court of Appeals, 10th District (Waco)2002

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API