Legal Opinion

Napier v. State

Supreme Court of Georgia

Decided June 2, 2003No. S03A0007, S03A0009PublishedCited by 24 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Sears, Presiding Justice.

Appellants Jack Wayne Napier and James Neal Halley appeal their convictions for murder, concealing the death of another and auto theft.1 Among other things, appellants urge the trial court erred by forbidding voir dire questioning regarding appellants’ status as prison escapees and in charging the jury on certain statutory presumptions regarding venue. Because the issue of appellants’ escape from prison was relevant to the subject matter of the State’s prosecution, the trial court abused its discretion by prohibiting them from raising that issue during voir dire.…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Jackson v. VirginiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  2. Bruton v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
  3. Giglio v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  4. Sandstrom v. MontanaSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  5. Jones v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 2000

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by24 opinions

  1. Ellington v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 2012
  2. Jones v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 2015
  3. Reddick v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2003
  4. Anthony v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2005
  5. Edmond v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 2008

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API